The confluence of administrative and judicial executions creates a number of concerns arising from incompatibilities in doctrine Rosemary and case law.In this paper the attention is paid to the consequences of differences in the regulations on the management of the administrative and judicial enforcement of property foreclosures.It is concluded that the regulatory differences are so significant that they often exclude the possibility of executing transfer Risky B to one of the law enforcement agencies without prejudice to the rights of the parties.
In that case, when the court makes a decision its actions become a substantive, contrary to the general principles.